Reviewer Guideline

All manuscripts submitted to our journal undergo a double-blind peer review by at least two experts in the relevant field. Reviewers are responsible for critically assessing the scientific quality, originality, methodological soundness, and compliance with the journal’s publication policies. They must conduct their evaluations impartially, objectively, and confidentially, reporting any ethical concerns or suspicions of plagiarism. Constructive feedback from reviewers aims to help authors improve their work. Reviewers should avoid conflicts of interest and complete their evaluations within the designated timeframe.